multimodal-attacks
Multimodal Attacks
📂 ai-red-teaming
AI RED TEAMING TECHNIQUES#
Multimodal Attacks
Cross-modal exploitation and modality-specific attack techniques
Available Techniques#
Image-Based Prompt Injection#
Embedding malicious text instructions or prompts within images to bypass text-based content filters and inject harmful directives through the visual modality.
KEY FEATURES
-
• Hidden text in images
-
• Visual prompt injection
-
• OCR exploitation
PRIMARY DEFENSES
-
• Image content analysis
-
• OCR output sanitization
-
• Cross-modal validation
KEY RISKS
Cross-Modal Confusion Attack#
Exploiting inconsistencies or conflicts between different input modalities to confuse the AI system and bypass security controls or trigger unintended behaviors.
KEY FEATURES
-
• Modality conflict exploitation
-
• Contradictory input injection
-
• Priority manipulation
PRIMARY DEFENSES
-
• Cross-modal consistency validation
-
• Modality agreement requirements
-
• Conflict detection and rejection
KEY RISKS
Audio Adversarial Examples#
Crafting audio inputs with imperceptible perturbations that cause speech recognition or audio processing systems to misinterpret commands or bypass security measures.
KEY FEATURES
-
• Imperceptible audio perturbations
-
• Speech recognition manipulation
-
• Command misinterpretation
PRIMARY DEFENSES
-
• Audio perturbation detection
-
• Speech pattern validation
-
• Multi-model audio verification
KEY RISKS
Video Manipulation & Injection#
Manipulation of video streams or recorded content to inject malicious visual sequences, subliminal frames, or adversarial patterns that compromise video understanding systems.
KEY FEATURES
-
• Frame injection
-
• Subliminal content insertion
-
• Temporal attack patterns
PRIMARY DEFENSES
-
• Frame-by-frame validation
-
• Temporal consistency checks
-
• Subliminal content detection
KEY RISKS
Sensor Data Poisoning#
Manipulation of sensor inputs (IoT devices, environmental sensors, biometric readers) to feed false data to AI systems and compromise decision-making in autonomous systems.
KEY FEATURES
-
• Sensor input manipulation
-
• Environmental data falsification
-
• Biometric spoofing
PRIMARY DEFENSES
-
• Sensor data validation
-
• Multi-sensor verification
-
• Anomaly detection algorithms
KEY RISKS
Modality-Specific Jailbreaking#
Bypassing content filters and safety measures by exploiting weaknesses in specific modality processing, using less-protected input channels to circumvent text-based safeguards.
KEY FEATURES
-
• Modality-specific filter bypass
-
• Weak channel exploitation
-
• Alternative input abuse
PRIMARY DEFENSES
-
• Unified safety filters across modalities
-
• Equivalent protection per channel
-
• Cross-modal content analysis
KEY RISKS
Embedding Space Manipulation#
Crafting inputs across multiple modalities that occupy similar positions in embedding space to confuse similarity matching, retrieval, or classification systems.
KEY FEATURES
-
• Embedding collision creation
-
• Similarity exploitation
-
• Retrieval manipulation
PRIMARY DEFENSES
-
• Embedding space validation
-
• Multi-modal consistency checking
-
• Semantic verification
KEY RISKS
Cross-Modal Transfer Attack#
Crafting adversarial examples in one modality that successfully transfer to compromise other modalities, exploiting shared representations in multimodal models.
KEY FEATURES
-
• Transferability exploitation
-
• Shared representation attacks
-
• Cross-modal perturbations
PRIMARY DEFENSES
-
• Modality-specific processing
-
• Transfer detection mechanisms
-
• Independent validation per modality
KEY RISKS
Multimodal Backdoor Attack#
Inserting backdoors that activate only when specific combinations of inputs across multiple modalities are present, creating stealthy trigger-based compromises.
KEY FEATURES
-
• Multi-modal trigger conditions
-
• Combination-based activation
-
• Stealthy backdoor insertion
PRIMARY DEFENSES
-
• Training data validation
-
• Backdoor detection algorithms
-
• Multi-modal integrity checks
KEY RISKS
Modality Prioritization Exploitation#
Exploiting the system's prioritization or weighting of different input modalities to bypass security controls by manipulating lower-priority channels.
KEY FEATURES
-
• Priority order exploitation
-
• Weight manipulation
-
• Low-priority channel abuse
PRIMARY DEFENSES
-
• Balanced modality processing
-
• Equal validation across channels
-
• Dynamic priority adjustment
KEY RISKS
Ethical Guidelines for Multimodal Attacks#
When working with multimodal attacks techniques, always follow these ethical guidelines:
-
• Only test on systems you own or have explicit written permission to test
-
• Focus on building better defenses, not conducting attacks
-
• Follow responsible disclosure practices for any vulnerabilities found
-
• Document and report findings to improve security for everyone
-
• Consider the potential impact on users and society
-
• Ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations
FROM THE ENGINEER BEHIND THIS CATALOG
Get your agent system red-teamed#
The attacks documented here work on production agent systems every day. Have yours tested before someone else does: prompt injection, jailbreaks, tool misuse and data exfiltration, with every finding written up next to its fix.
€750 instead of €1,500, one week, written report and walkthrough call, until 30 September